- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:17:25 +0900
- To: Fran輟is Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
At 22:56 06/12/05, Fran輟is Yergeau wrote: > >Hi Michael, > >First an apology for the late reply. > >We did discuss your proposal and came to the conclusion that it is a good idea. Our conclusion was that it doesn't mean dropping early normalization, just recognizing that it cannot be absolutely poerfect and that the Schema proposal can therefore be beneficial. I haven't been present during the discussion, but I think this is a very good outcome. In addition, I suggest that something like the above be added as an explanation to the relevant functions. Regards, Martin. >C. M. Sperberg-McQueen a 馗rit : >> Dear colleagues, >> just a quick nudge. Did you ever find time to discuss the issue >> described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0134.html >> and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0172.html >> -- namely the issue raised against XML Schema 1.1 athttp://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3245 >> ? >> If so, the rest of the XML Schema Working Group and I would be glad to >> hear your thoughts. >> Thanks. >> Michael Sperberg-McQueen >> >> > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Friday, 29 December 2006 08:46:29 UTC