- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:22:34 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hi all, The minutes of yesterday's call are at http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html and below as text. Regards, Felix. [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ i18n core working group 31 Jan 2006 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jan/0039.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-irc Attendees Present Felix, Francois, Karunesh, Mary, Richard Regrets Chair Francois Scribe Felix Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]summary of rfc 3066 bis 2. [6]Mapping of XML names into programming languages 3. [7]Comments on charmod norm 4. [8]Replies to comments on CSS selectors 5. [9]CDF review 6. [10]action items * [11]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ summary of rfc 3066 bis [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jan/004 1.html [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Jan/0041.html Felix conclusion: we can continue to refer to rfc 3066 or its successor Francois: it would be good to have an FAQ on this Richard: I have asked Addison to write an FAQ Francois: For the moment we tell spec writers to point to RFC 3066 and its successor Mapping of XML names into programming languages Francois: explains the issue, described in [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/ 0126.html ... it is a general thing of escaping characters ... we want to tell them to use escaping as in XML or Java ... not in URL where the bytes are escaped ... so "use the 'hex' code for each character that you cannot have", and that's it [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/0126.html Comments on charmod norm Francois: Did not have time to look at this Felix: Did not have time to look in this, should do it before the tech plenary, to be able to talk to the XML / XSL / XQuery / XML Schema folks <scribe> ACTION: francois / all to go through charmod norm comments of QT people etc. (ONGOING) [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] Replies to comments on CSS selectors [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/ 0133.html [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/0133.html comment 1 on CSS felix: let's give this up francois: spec's are not tutorials comment 2 on CSS francois: In that case it is a source of confusion ... all it requires saying "this is not the type as in XML Schema" felix: let's try again comment 3 on CSS francois: you see various usages of selectors (css, w3c selectors) ... they need to clarify this felix: go back to them to clarify their usage with a consistent terminology comment 5 on CSS Francois: o.k. with that comment 6 on CSS Francois: a problem with definition of conformance ... we should push back on them to define conformance with respect to the binding mechanism ... we don't have to insist of prescribing it comment 8 on CSS comment 11 on CSS [16]http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#pseudo-cla sses [16] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#pseudo-classes <fyergeau> [17]http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#attribute- substrings [17] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#attribute-substrings francois: drop this comment 12 felix: o.k. comment 15 Richard: they seem to be afraid of matching problems ... they are saying how they define the matching is done ... not rfc 3066bis or something else Francois: it was poorly worded in the spec ... we should ask Addison or Mark or both what they think about this <scribe> ACTION: Felix to ask Addison and Mark about language tags in css selectors [recorded in [18]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] <fyergeau> comment 16 <fyergeau> we need to insist <fyergeau> on case-insensitve comment 17 accepted comment 20 francois: need to wait for answer or asked again comment 23 francois: we should keep that open, until they clarify the relation between css and selectors (see comment 3) ... what they do for 3 will make it clear CDF review [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/ 0133.html [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/0133.html comment cdr-2 francois: drop this comment cdr-5 francois: I still disagree ... I have a scenario with an XHTML document which contains an SVG image ... if I make it external, the language information does not apply anymore ... my concern is: what should happen if there is no other information? ... that is, no "authoritative metadata" <scribe> ACTION: Felix to give back i18n core WG feedback to CSS and CDF WG [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] action items <scribe> ACTION: felix to summarize RFC 3066bis and to contact AP and Mark (ONGOING) [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] <scribe> ACTION: felix to ask addison for preparations for meetings with ws folks at tech plenary (ONGOING) [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] <scribe> ACTION: Felix to contact Moataz about HP replacement and TP (ONGOING) [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Felix to ask Addison and Mark about language tags in css selectors [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: Felix to give back our feedback to CSS and CDF WG [recorded in [25]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] [ONGOING] ACTION: felix to ask addison for preparations for meetings with ws folks at tech plenary [recorded in [26]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] [ONGOING] ACTION: Felix to contact Moataz about HP replacement and TP [recorded in [27]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] [ONGOIN] ACTION: felix to summarize RFC 3066bis and to contact AP and Mark [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] [PENDING] ACTION: francois / all to go through charmod norm comments of QT people etc. [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([31]CVS log) $Date: 2006/02/01 01:10:41 $ [30] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 01:22:40 UTC