[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: pr tags missing

Comment from the i18n review of:

Comment 20
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
H62, Examples

Examples 1 and 2 should have rp tags. There is no good reason to leave them out. This will just set a bad example.

This comment, of course, affects Example 3 also.

Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 17:53:53 UTC