RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Section 5.3

I understand your decision better.  It might help to clarify the difference
between your use of orthography and homograph in the glossary of terms,
section 1.5, and to reiterate that difference in section 5.
 
If you don't hear from other members of the i18n core working group, please
regard this issue as closed.

Thanks, 
RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/


 


________________________________

	From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] 
	Sent: 26 May 2006 15:24
	To: www-voice@w3.org
	Cc: Baggia Paolo; Richard Ishida
	Subject: Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Section 5.3
	
	
	 
	Issue R103-31
	From Richard Ishida (2006-03-21):
	
	Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 
	
	Resolution: Reject 
	
	The examples in section 5.3 [1] do not strictly contain homophones.
A
	pair of homophones is two different *words* (thus, with two
different
	*meanings*) that have the same pronunciation. Each example in 5.3
	contains one word that can be written in different ways and that
retains
	the same meaning and pronunciation. 
	
	We think that "Multiple Orthographies" is a common phenomenon and
worth
	to be presented in a separate section with examples and
explanations. 
	
	Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's
resolution,
	whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you
wish
	to register an objection. 
	
	
	[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/#S5.3 
	
	Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.
	
	
------------------------------------------------------------------------
	---
	From: 
	Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:51:55 +0000
	To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
	Message-Id: <20060321175154.127644EFDE@homer.w3.org> 
	
	
	Comment from the i18n review of:
	http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/
	
	Comment 31
	At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
	Editorial/substantive: E
	Owner: RI
	
	Location in reviewed document:
	5.3
	
	Comment: 
	We don't see any value in the additional examples in 5.3, since all
	examples are instances of homographs or homophones (or expansions,
which
	are not referred to here). Why not skip this and go straight into
5.4?
	
	
	Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia
S.p.A.
	
	================================================
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
	This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
	above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
	the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
	is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
	the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to
	<mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank
you
	<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
	================================================

Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2006 15:22:59 UTC