[Fwd: Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Input methods]

FYI

Forwarded message 1

  • From: dom@w3.org <dom@w3.org>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:56:24 +0000 (GMT)
  • Subject: Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Input methods
  • To: <fsasaki@w3.org>
  • Cc: public-bpwg-comments@dolph.w3.org
  • Message-Id: <20060412165624.2426D6637C@dolph.w3.org>
 Dear <fsasaki@w3.org>,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20060222164248.8AF1A4390@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on 2.2 
Input:
Comment from the i18n review of:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/



Comment 6

At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/

Editorial/substantive: S

Owner: FS

Location in reviewed document:

Sec. 2.2
[http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/#iddiv2102172624]



Comment:

 

We propose to add to this section on \"input\" the requirement to provide
an adequate input method for the user. Especially for complex scripts like
Chinese or Japanese, this is a crucial requirement.

Working Group Resolution:
The Best Practices do not set requirements on user agents, only on
content; we already give recommendations on input mode for the content 
(see AVOID_FREE_TEXT and DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE]. Any further consideration
would better fit in the techniques related to these best practices, on
which we welcome contributions:

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/techs/CategoryBpDefaultInputMode

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/techs/CategoryBpAvoidFreeText

----

Received on Thursday, 13 April 2006 08:21:48 UTC