Re: Review of serialization spec

Hi Sharon,

Sharon Adler wrote:

>Thanks it is helpful to see them early but we needed to understand how to
>process them - we would not want to process if they were going to change.
>We will hold off until we get a clearer picture on the status of each.
>  
>
Good. As I wrote, we will talk about them on the i18n-core telecon on 
Tuesday, so after that you will receive the last change.

Best regards, Felix.

>Thanks again.
>
>Sharon
>
>Sharon C. Adler
> Senior Manager, Extensible Technologies
> IBM Research
> PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY  10598
> tel:  914-784-6411 t/l 863
> fax: 914-784-6324
>
>
>
>                                                                           
>             Felix Sasaki                                                  
>             <fsasaki@w3.org>                                              
>                                                                        To 
>             05/12/2005 08:57          Sharon Adler/Watson/IBM@IBMUS       
>             PM                                                         cc 
>                                       w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org, Scott            
>                                       Boag/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus,           
>                                       liam@w3.org                         
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       Re: Review of serialization spec    
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>Hi Sharon, hi Scott, hi all,
>
>I am sorry for confusing you with the comments. So far these are
>personal comments, based on Martin's comments etc.We will have an
>i18n-core-wg telecon next week (Tuesday evening, Japanese time), where
>we will reach final consensus on our comments. I will sent the result to
>you, i.e. enter it into Bugzilla or revise the currently entered
>comments, until Wednesday morning (Japanese time). I.e., for your f2f
>meeting, it would be good discuss the i18n comments on Wednesday or
>Thursday. On the i18n-telecon, we also will take into account the
>responses you are making now. The reason that I have entered the
>comments into bugzilla now is that currently I and Richard Ishida at the
>www2005 conference, so we cannot finish the comments until May 13. Liam
>said it would be helpful to have the comments in Bugzilla as soon as
>possible.
>
>Best regards, Felix.
>
>Sharon Adler wrote:
>
>  
>
>>For me just to be clear - please help me understand the status of each of
>>the bugs you recently submitted to Bugzilla.
>>
>>1. Are they officially from I18N and new bugs to be processed.
>>
>>2. Are any stemming from the first Last Call and you wish us to re-process
>>our answers to you - even though it seems that you accepted our formal
>>response previously.
>>
>>3.  Any other status that you can help us understand.
>>
>>Please let me know ASAP - we are trying to put together our Agenda for
>>    
>>
>next
>  
>
>>weeks Face-to-face meeting.
>>
>>Thanks for your help.
>>
>>Sharon
>>
>>
>>
>>Sharon C. Adler
>>Senior Manager, Extensible Technologies
>>IBM Research
>>PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY  10598
>>tel:  914-784-6411 t/l 863
>>fax: 914-784-6324
>>
>>----- Forwarded by Sharon Adler/Watson/IBM on 05/12/2005 02:17 PM -----
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            Scott
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            Boag/Cambridge/IB
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            M@Lotus                                                    To
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            Sent by:                  fsasaki@w3.org
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            w3c-xsl-wg-reques                                          cc
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            t@w3.org                  w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>                                                                  Subject
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>                                      I18n review of serialization spec
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            05/12/2005 02:05
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>            PM
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Felix.  The XSL Working Group is a bit confused about the comments
>>posted about the serialization spec
>>(http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-serialization-review.html).
>>Seems like most of these are previous last call comments.  Is it your
>>intention that these need to be reprocessed by the WG?
>>
>>#6 on the list (Bug 1327) is the one comment that seems new.
>>
>>Any guidance would be much appreciated.
>>
>>Here are the bugzilla links:
>>
>>[Bug 1322]  New: Serializ  Inserting spaces
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1322
>>
>>[Bug 1323]  New: Serializ  serialization parameter encoding
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
>>
>>[Bug 1324]  New: Serializ  on encoding
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1324
>>
>>[Bug 1325]  New: Serializ  encoding
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1325
>>
>>[Bug 1326]  New: Serializ  include-content-type
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1326
>>
>>[Bug 1327]  New: Serializ  URI-escaping
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1327
>>
>>[Bug 1328]  New: Serializ  XML output method, encoding
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1328
>>
>>[Bug 1329]  New: Serializ  output method, omit-xml-declaration
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1329
>>
>>[Bug 1330]  New: Serializ  escaping and non-ascii-characters
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1330
>>
>>[Bug 1331]  New: Serializ  whitespace and HTML output method
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1331
>>
>>[Bug 1332]  New: Serializ  editorial error
>>  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1332
>>
>>-scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>  
>

Received on Saturday, 14 May 2005 00:07:13 UTC