Dear Murata san,

With this mail I sent you a passage from my review of the SVG tiny 
specification [1]:

We are wondering what the role of XML 1.1 in your specification is. In 
the section on "Conforming SVG Document Fragments" [2] you mention XML 
1.1. as the basis for well-formed SVG document fragments. You use RELAX 
NG to describe SVG Tiny 1.2 validity. To our knowledge RELAX NG only 
supports the information set produced out of an XML 1.0 document, cf. 
the RELAX NG spec. So the question is how you want to support XML 1.1 
during validation of SVG tiny documents.

It would be great if you could tell us your opinion about this.

Thank you very much & best regards, Felix Sasaki.


Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 05:33:50 UTC