Re: Simplified or traditional for each Chinese macrolanguage from Koji Ishii on 2016-07-27 (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org from July to September 2016)

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:31:07 +0900
To: Andrew Cunningham <lang.support@gmail.com>
Cc: Xidorn Quan <me@upsuper.org>, 劉慶 <ryukeikun@gmail.com>, ishida <ishida@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 董福興 Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>, Makoto Kato <m_kato@ga2.so-net.ne.jp>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbUSk0pQxw_vvrh+Bg6ocyoXB-+ZehOEXkq9NWhezJ1UEw@mail.gmail.com>

2016/07/27 午後6:57 "Andrew Cunningham" <lang.support@gmail.com>:
>
>
> >   hak=zh-TW
>
> Wouldn't hak=zh-Hant be more accurate? It  is used in a number of
countries across the Chinese diaspora.

Right, although it's a minor difference, we should say that this is a
lang-to-script mapping, not a lang-to-region mapping.

/koji

Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 10:31:45 UTC