- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:37:22 -0500
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
That's a good point. If the targeted audiences are CJK authors, you're correct that they should use U+FF08, because U+0028 are usually designed to match to x-height, which does not work good for Kanji/Kana glyphs. However, U+0028 works better for who doesn't have U+FF08 glyphs in their fonts. Maybe the primary target of the section is CJK authors and it's better to let them know they should use U+FF08 instead of U+0028? Regards, Koji -----Original Message----- From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:35 PM To: CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org) Subject: Fullwidth parens for rp ? At http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-rp-element.html we see the following example of markup for ruby, including fallback parentheses: <ruby>漢<rp> (</rp><rt>かん</rt><rp>) </rp>字<rp> (</rp><rt>じ</rt><rp>) </rp></ruby> This example uses 0020 SPACE ( 0028 LEFT PARENTHESIS Assuming that that is the kind of parenthesis that the user wants to use (rather than say a square corner, for example) should it actually just use ( FF08 FULLWIDTH LEFT PARENTHESIS Same idea for the right paren. ie. <ruby>漢<rp>(</rp><rt>かん</rt><rp>)</rp>字<rp>(</rp><rt>じ</rt> <rp>)</rp></ruby> Or should it be U+0028 without the space? RI -- Richard Ishida Internationalization Activity Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 05:37:56 UTC