- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:54:40 +0100
- To: "'MURATA Makoto \(FAMILY Given\)'" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Cc: <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp] > Sent: 28 September 2010 01:22 ... > > > Re [5] > > > So, do we need "ruby-position: bopomofo-above" and "ruby-position: > > > bopomofo-right"? > > > > No. Bopomofo ruby is also special in that .... (2) it always appears to the > > right of the character, > > whether the base orientation is vertical or horizontal. > > This is not true. See > > http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~eb2m-mrt/EGLS_TW_eng/00004.pdf > > from Taiwan What's the context for this slide? I'm trying to understand both how prevalent this approach is, and what it's implications are. For example, this could be a set of rules to build into the implementation of [ruby-position: above] for bopomofo display, rather than a case for [ruby-position: bopomofo-above]. Cheers, RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 13:55:14 UTC