[Bug 15488] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
[Bug 15488] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
[Bug 18490] make any element with an explicit lang or dir attribute bidi-isolated by default
[Bug 19067] New: i18n comment 4 : at least by default, <br> should constitute a bidi paragraph break
[Bug 10828] i18n comment 4 : at least by default, <br> should constitute a bidi paragraph break
[Bug 10828] i18n comment 4 : at least by default, <br> should constitute a bidi paragraph break
[Bug 15488] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
[Bug 17670] unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
[Bug 18490] make any element with an explicit lang or dir attribute bidi-isolated by default
[Bug 18339] When the parent element is not an HTML element, what directionality is inherited?
[Bug 18339] When the parent element is not an HTML element, what directionality is inherited?
[Bug 18339] When the parent element is not an HTML element, what directionality is inherited?
[Bug 18490] make any element with an explicit lang or dir attribute bidi-isolated by default
Fwd: [html5bidi] default bidi isolation
[Bug 18490] make any element with an explicit lang or dir attribute bidi-isolated by default
Fwd: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- RE: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- Re: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- Re: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- RE: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- Re: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- Re: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- Re: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
- Re: [cssom-view] value of scrollLeft in RTL situations is completely busted across browsers
[css3-text][css3-writing-modes] isolation updates
comments on Unicode PRI #231
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18339] When the parent element is not an HTML element, the directionality of the child should default to LTR
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18339] When the parent element is not an HTML element, the directionality of the child should default to LTR
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18340] The root element's directionality should be a UA-specific value
[Bug 18339] When the parent element is not an HTML element, the directionality of the child should default to LTR
[Bug 17670] unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
[Bug 17886] New: unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
- [Bug 17886] unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
- [Bug 17886] unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
- [Bug 17886] unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
- [Bug 17886] unicode-bidi value combination of "bidi-override" and "isolate" has been renamed to "isolate-override"
[Bug 16564] The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
[Bug 17835] New: The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
- [Bug 17835] The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
- [Bug 17835] The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
- [Bug 17835] The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
- [Bug 17835] The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
- [Bug 17835] The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters
[Bug 15488] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
[Bug 17814] New: it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
- [Bug 17814] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
- [Bug 17814] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
- [Bug 17814] it makes no sense to limit the placeholder attribute to values of the same direction as the <input>
[Bug 10824] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
[Bug 17770] New: i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
- [Bug 17770] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
- [Bug 17770] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
- [Bug 17770] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
- [Bug 17770] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
[Bug 10824] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
[Bug 10824] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
[Bug 10824] i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position
Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- RE: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- RE: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- RE: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- RE: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions
- Re: Proposal for isolation characters in Unicode and the unicode-bidi:isolate and unicode-bidi:plaintext definitions