- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:47:01 +0000
- To: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18339 Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.co | |m --- Comment #2 from Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> 2012-07-25 06:47:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Unless, of course, the spec defines directionality as a binary thing on all > elements, not just HTML elements. In which case it might be good to explicitly > call that out. I think directionality should work the same regardless of whether an element is defined in HTML or not. Making it do something different (e.g. defaulting to LTR for the element or its children) would break existing pages. Even if there were no existing RTL pages using non-HTML elements (which there certainly are), I do not see any utility in making the directionality of non-HTML elements work differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 06:47:02 UTC