Re: [clreq] Gap could be misunderstood as a literal typographic gap (#694)

We discussed this in today's i18n WG meeting, and the consensus was that it's not likely to cause ambiguity in the context of this document, so we decided to close the issue. Thank you.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by xfq
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/694#issuecomment-3188773217 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 14 August 2025 14:59:40 UTC