- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 13:52:50 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
> Based on discussion during the CLReq call on 17 Nov, the team feels that the term "inline annotation" would be appropriate instead of using "warichū" I have no problem with choosing a non-Japanese word for 'warichu', but calling it 'inline annotation' rather presupposes that the warichu approach is the only approach used for inline annotations. Is that the case? If not, how would one distinguish between the warichu approach and another approach? -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/109#issuecomment-1816471257 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 17 November 2023 13:52:52 UTC