- From: Ambrose Li via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 01:53:40 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Unless we can persuade Unicode to de-unify these code points, IMHO most of these are unsolvable problems caused by Unicode’s decision to “unify” code points that should never have been unified because (as you’ve pointed out) “minimal pairs” can easily be found. These incorrect unifications are actually causing a lot of headaches for English speakers. I can add to this list the width and spacing of curly quote marks (“‘’”). These glyphs in simplified Chinese fonts have completely different widths and spacings than the same glyphs in other fonts. -- GitHub Notification of comment by acli Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/410#issuecomment-1012677467 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 14 January 2022 01:53:42 UTC