- From: Fuqiao Xue via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 05:16:49 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
It does look like it was a typo. I checked some historical versions and found that the word "adjacent" was used before. See https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-jlreq-20090604/#fig2_3_20-en -- GitHub Notification of comment by xfq Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/pull/322#issuecomment-1006291878 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2022 05:16:50 UTC