Re: [jlreq] Digital native version of JLReq, discuss goals and changes from the current version (#281)

There are any number of examples of needless duplication of the alphabet in Unicode if you base your unification decision on appearance alone. In the case of the above list, the primary reason they should not have been unified is their treatment when designed as full width glyphs makes them essentially different characters than their Latin counterparts. Especially in vertical text, but also when composing horizontally. I wish this could be fixed but we seem to be stuck with awkward work-arounds and lots of necessary user education. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by macnmm
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/281#issuecomment-903278293 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 22 August 2021 14:33:23 UTC