Re: [alreq] move function into preProcess (#240)

Unfortunately, there's no improvement. https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/WD-alreq-gap-20210120/#bidi_text

I must say, that seems odd, if the scripts are run before the general respec code, since the structure of the document looks ok, it's just the bits that should be sucked in from GH issues that are missing.

Could there be a caching problem snarling things up?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/pull/240#issuecomment-763543606 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2021 11:36:20 UTC