- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:35:33 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
Here's an attempt to summarise where i think we are with this thread: 1. @Huji proposes to change \627 to \627\644\641 for the first value. It would be good to have some evidence of this usage so we can feel confident in making the change. 2. We confirmed that fixed is the right type for persian-abjad and persian-alphabetic styles. 3. We believe that counter 5 in the alphabetic style is <span class="codepoint" translate="no"><span lang="fa" dir="rtl">ه‍</span> [<span class="uname">U+0647 ARABIC LETTER HEH</span> + <span class="uname">U+200D ZERO WIDTH JOINER</span>]</span> 4. There appears to be a possibility that 11, 12, and 13 should be یا and یب and یج. 5. @shervinafshar 's image shows that in the abjad style 13 could be <span class="codepoint" translate="no"><span lang="fa" dir="rtl">مـ</span> [<span class="uname">U+0645 ARABIC LETTER MEEM</span> + <span class="uname">U+0640 ARABIC TATWEEL</span>]</span> We're still awaiting further information related to points 1, 4, and 5 before making changes to the doc. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/predefined-counter-styles/issues/23#issuecomment-697280020 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 10:35:35 UTC