Re: [ltli] Clarification proposal about conformance (#10)

Looking at the document, it seems to me that the placement of the new mustard may belong closer to the first piece of mustard (​Specifications for the Web that require language identification MUST refer to [BCP47]. ) Either than or have some subsections, one of which might be Applications, following on from Specifications (?)

I think i'd say "Applications that provide language information as part of URIs (e.g. in the realm of RDF) SHOULD use [BCP47].", but i leave that up to you.

I think at some point we might need some explanatory text to follow the mustard: eg. explaining current situation with RDF, perhaps, and benefits of moving to BCP47.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/ltli/pull/10#issuecomment-655519687 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 13:27:49 UTC