Re: [jlreq] develop an amendment for JLReq 2nd edition (#162)

Yes, I very much agree that we want more background info.

As for your concern about de-emphasising traditionally acceptable practices, I think we can avoid misunderstandings by clearly explaining that these apply for reflowable digital text.

GitHub Notification of comment by kidayasuo
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 03:15:53 UTC