Re: [jlreq] develop an amendment for JLReq 2nd edition (#162)

Yes, I very much agree that we want more background info.

As for your concern about de-emphasising traditionally acceptable practices, I think we can avoid misunderstandings by clearly explaining that these apply for reflowable digital text.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kidayasuo
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/162#issuecomment-581723880 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 03:15:53 UTC