Re: [clreq] Editorial fix to Abstract (#286)

Looking good. One nit: 'correspondence' should probably be 'correspondences'.  Otherwise good to go.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by r12a
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/286#issuecomment-616978242 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2020 06:23:40 UTC