[clreq] Pull Request: Editorial fix to Abstract

xfq has just submitted a new pull request for https://github.com/w3c/clreq:

== Editorial fix to Abstract ==
E.g. seems better than i.e. in this context, and that's also what the Chinese says. (I added a comma after e.g. as well.)

See https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/286