As fascinating as etymology "رُقعة" and "رِقعة" is to me I guess the intention was to agree on using an existing transliteration scheme here; either from those linked here by Richard or from any other resource that you encountered in your research. Any thoughts on that? -- GitHub Notification of comment by shervinafshar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/16#issuecomment-160925478 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 10:17:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 18:09:34 UTC