- From: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:13:23 -0400
- To: <public-hypertext-cg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2012/03/23-hcg-minutes.html
and below as text.
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Hypertext Coordination Group Teleconference
23 Mar 2012
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2012/03/23-hcg-irc
Attendees
Present
Debbie_Dahl, Bert, Janina_Sajka, Steven
Regrets
Chair
Debbie_Dahl
Scribe
janina
Contents
* [3]Topics
* [4]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 23 March 2012
<scribe> scribe: janina
<Steven> action-71?
<trackbot> ACTION-71 does not exist
dd: I may have had an action to move old actions to our new
tracker!
<ddahl> action-1?
<trackbot> ACTION-1 -- Chris Lilley to see which tracker is on
irc nowadays -- due 2012-03-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [5]https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/HCG/track/actions/1
[5] https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/HCG/track/actions/1
<ddahl> action-2?
<trackbot> ACTION-2 does not exist
ddahl: Old action was to discuss media handling
... Old action #72 was to discuss discovery, where there's
quite a lot going on.
... We also have Actions 73 & 75 to do with tracker management
...
... So, no specific discussion items
sp: Suggest AC Forum the place to take Janina's Halloween
concern
ddahl: But HCG a good place to see if other WG's have this
issue
... Not so much in MM, but maybe we've people who choose work
over family.
... Suspect they'd rather not have the conflict.
sp: Not so important in Europe. No one's mentioned the
conflict.
ddahl: I was happy it was earlier so I got vote (U.S.) in
person rather than absentee.
... Always something
... Suggest posting something to the AC Forum
... Notes that it really is a big deal for young children.
... So the point is to raise awareness of this additional
constraint in scheduling TPAC
janina: I'll raise it in AC Forum.
... Noting that ARIA User Agent Implementation Guide needs to
go through second review
ddahl: Who to review?
janina: Primarily browsers -- implementors of a11y features
ddahl: ddahl: Were there PF comments that were not forwarded
for MultiModal?
janina: Perhaps, I'll check
... We're trying to approve our process for comments. We need
to get the substance out there, even when it's still an
individual opinion
... So that we don't not send because our process to get group
approval of the comments gets commenting delayed
<Steven> [6]http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0
[6] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0
sp: Xforms has been producing working drafts via Wiki
... Intentionally looks like a standard W3 spec
... We have scripts to turn this into html
... Working this way has raised the question of why working
drafts for TR if they're constantly available via the Wiki?
janina: Maybe because the TR process was defined before we had
Wikis?
sp: Maybe something else to raise in the AC Forum
ddahl: Or also the process questionairre
... Started to respond to that questionairre and found it takes
time to do a good job of it
... I think the working draft on wiki question is a good one
... Looking at the Xforms Wiki, looks exactly like a TR Working
Draft
sp: This came up when our last editor moved on and no one
stepped up to replace them
... We decided everyone was an editor
... We moved to this format more or less automatically as we
had a transform that took html to wikitalk
... It was surprisingly little work
ddahl: And another script to go back to html?
sp: yes
... LC should be html because you want a stable unchanging doc
at that point
... But seems no point to heartbeat anylonger.
Bert: Difficult to refer to things that change, though.
... Fragment identifiers start to break
ddahl: Seems an ability to unroll and look at changes is there
Bert: Also, when I do presentations, I prepare in advance,
sometimes weeks in advance,
... And it's nice to have reliable URIs to refer to
ddahl: Good point
... I suppose could pull out an ad hoc working draft
janina: I'm seeing more and more URIs in print books and wonder
how many of those are now dead
... Want to say that PF will be suggestiong W3C consider
implications of cross organizational collaboration
... We think our process docs/policies should be clear about
implications of that
... i.e. where's the W3C interest, how to distinguish W3 from
the other org, etc.
ddahl: Not sure how to generalize.
... Noting that we've had useful discussion today even though
we had no agenda up front
... Particularly missing HTML 5 participation. We need that.
Doesn't need to be a chair.
... No call on April 6, Good Friday.
... Next will be April 20
<ddahl> trackbot, format logs
<trackbot> Sorry, ddahl, I don't understand 'trackbot, format
logs'. Please refer to [7]http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc
for help
[7] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc
<ddahl> trackbot, format minutes
<trackbot> Sorry, ddahl, I don't understand 'trackbot, format
minutes'. Please refer to
[8]http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
[8] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 15:14:03 UTC