- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 23:12:51 +0200
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Markus, > we have are missing commitment and contribution... +1 > and, probably most importantly, lack of code that is driving and informing the discussions. +1, that's a good observation > This made it hard to assess whether a design proposal was good or bad. Indeed!! > So, my proposal is comparatively simple: we start creating a Hydra client (or a couple of them) and use it to drive the further development of Hydra. Makes sense; probably good to have milestones also, so that we become more or less in sync. "a couple" seems important; otherwise, we don't really need a spec. > The server side is obviously important as well, but it is comparatively simple to mock or fake so I would mainly focus on the client-side. I wouldn't disregard the server entirely; we can mock or fake, but real-world use cases are important. …and the survey is a great idea! Ruben
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 21:13:21 UTC