- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:27:14 +0200
- To: Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJQMV7hJNaGJ0HtrMgCRyEnny0MNae4wc7Zq-zoeuEkqw@mail.gmail.com>
On 29 September 2015 at 22:54, Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de> wrote: > > > Am 29.09.2015 um 22:40 schrieb Markus Lanthaler: > >> On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:13 AM, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote: >> >>> 2015-09-28 21:38 GMT+02:00 Markus Lanthaler: >>> >>>> It certainly looks nice, but what do we need it for? We do have an IRC >>>> channel that we basically never used. >>>> >>> "We do have an IRC channel is never used" is a pretty good reason why >>> Gitter should be considered. >>> >> Is it? :-) >> >> >> > I think _not_. Gitter is quite new and only popular among developers which > deal with recent stuff. > But we should not limit the discussion to developers, what about non-devs > that just > want to discuss with us and don't happen to have a GitHub account. > IRC's acceptance is just bigger and that's why it should be used. > > > FWIW quite a few other teams in the linked data space have been using gitter instead of IRC. It's been a great choice so far. IRC hasnt been. Non devs and devs participate. I've also written a logger to save files in RDF. Anyone can start a room, and invite people to join, often you can get a good group up very quickly. If it's not desired from the hydra root, it's quite easily possible for another root to be used. Just fire up a publc chat room of the form gitter.im/parent/hydra ... perhaps it would be a good idea to start a general Linked Data type parent project of which hydra is one type of solution ...
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2015 22:27:44 UTC