RE: Call for consensus for the pagination design (ISSUE-42)

On 26 Okt 2015 at 22:44, Karol SzczepaƄski wrote:
>> We can then either move on to the next item or start a separate discussion
>> on how to extend it if people are interested to do so right ahead.
>
> I think real life scenarios will show if extensions are necessary. But what
> would be the next item?

My next few work items would be the following:

- discuss the model of operations overall
- define how to express the "expects" part of operations (considering the RDF Data Shapes WG's proposals)
- extend the expects part to other request formats; not just RDF-based ones but also for example application/x-www-form-urlencoded etc. That would make integration with existing web frameworks *much* simpler


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 21:35:18 UTC