Re: Call for consensus for the pagination design (ISSUE-42)

2015-10-19 20:20 GMT+02:00 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>:

> Maybe you misread what I wrote, we are very closely aligned. Both
> semantically as well as in the naming.

Perhaps I did misread it. Or I had a typo in what I wrote. I can't
remember. Good to hear that they will align closely, nonetheless! :)

>> What about "skip" and "top"?
>
> That would be offset and limit in non-OData terminology. We will discuss
> that separately.

Yes, good.

> The goal here is to get the most basic model specified.

Yep. I think we agree that the current model is a good one to move forward.

> I looked at OData in detail quite a while ago. We can have a separate discussion
> about what of OData's aspects would be worth supporting in the Hydra core vocab.

Sounds good!

> NuGet is switching from OData to a JSON-LD powered Web API:

Indeed they are. I knew they were switching, but was not aware of what
JSON-LD was when I read it, so it didn't properly sink in. Awesome!

-- 
Asbjørn Ulsberg           -=|=-        asbjorn@ulsberg.no
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 14:17:11 UTC