RE: Pagination - let's finalize the collection design (ISSUE-42)

On 17 Okt 2015 at 14:22, Dietrich Schulten wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 14.10.2015 um 16:45 schrieb elf Pavlik:
>> On 10/14/2015 03:15 PM, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
> 
>>> As I've written elsewhere[1]: [...]____ [1]
>>> https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/39#issuecomment-148041742
>>> 
>> 
>> Thank you for expressing your support directly on this github issue!
>> 
> 
> The current unpublished draft of rfc5988bis now describes a possibility
> to use URIs for IANA registered rels in a strictly defined area [1], and
> the discussion has moved to a new issue [2]. I find this very
> encouraging. Erik has pointed out that one must make it *very, very
> clear* that the registered rels may not be used in the rest of the
> world, and the discussion is still ongoing.

Thanks for the heads-up


> However, this is still an unpublished draft. Only if it reaches
> finalization or near-finalization before Hydra gets finalized, I would
> kindly propose to re-use the rels for paging in our paging view object.
>
> For the time being I suggest to observe the rfc5988bis progress, but
> postpone the discussion about IANA rels as paging controls in Hydra and
> stick with hydra:nextPage, hydra:previousPage etc.

+1

 
> [1]http://mnot.github.io/I-D/rfc5988bis/#registered-relation-types
> [2]https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/140



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Sunday, 18 October 2015 16:39:29 UTC