- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:19:05 +0000
- To: "elf Pavlik" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
October 13 2015 10:22 AM, "elf Pavlik" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > On 10/12/2015 08:41 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > >> On Monday, October 12, 2015 5:44 PM, John Walker wrote: >>> Isn't there already a vocab for this: >>> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab >>> >>> Defines first, next, prev, last... >> >> These concepts are very general so they probably exist in many vocabularies. > > They also exist as registered IANA Link Relations > https://github.com/mnot/I-D/issues/39#issuecomment-140694418 > > Most developers not comfortable with RDF would IMO stick to JSON-LD > where context could hide dependency on multiple vocabularies. People > using turle shouldn't have problem with hydra:view but link:next > Oh my, I see what Markus fears. It is certainly possible to combine all sorts of external vocabs and create a Franken-Hydra. But that said they are out there for reuse, provided that they don't introduce some fancy semantics. And I agree non-RDF people would not even notice, when URIs are hidden in @context. And those familiar with RDF, would they have any problem with reusing terms from other vocabularies? Tom
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 09:20:17 UTC