- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:47:13 +0200
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Cc: Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
2015-10-02 0:01 GMT+02:00 Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>: > The basic transitions look like this (URIs relativized to base): > > # page resource > > <?offset=20&limit=20> > a gp:Page , foaf:Document ; > gp:limit "20"^^xsd:long ; > gp:offset "20"^^xsd:long ; > gp:pageOf <> ; > <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#prev> > <?limit=20&offset=0> . > > # resource constructor > > <queries?mode=http://graphity.org/gp%23ConstructMode&forClass=http://graphity.org/gp%23Item> > a gp:Constructor , foaf:Document ; > gp:constructorOf <queries> ; > gp:forClass gp:Item ; > gp:mode gp:ConstructMode . > > As you can see, RDF is essential here. Sorry, but all I can see here is an example of exactly why I wrote the e-mail that started this thread in the first place. The above is basically just gibberish to someone unfamiliar with RDF. It makes absolutely zero sense whatsoever. When the concepts of RDF, its (weird) syntax and the different tools and technologies built on top of it are something you know and understand well, your perspective on this of course changes. Which is my point. Most people won't have this understanding and won't share this perspective. And I think it's important that Hydra appeals as much to these developers as to RDF connoisseurs. -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 11:47:41 UTC