- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:02:53 +0100
- To: Maik Riechert <maik.riechert@arcor.de>
- Cc: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
2015-11-19 11:12 GMT+01:00 Maik Riechert <maik.riechert@arcor.de>: >> How about using the <http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/up> >> relation to describe this link? > > Hm, it says "Refers to a parent document in a hierarchy of documents." This > could also mean a link further up the hierarchy and not to the immediate > parent. Not how I interpret it. That would necessitate a new relation called "root" or something similar, imho. > Even if you rely on a type of that parent (a "Collection") it could > still be ambiguous since you could have a hierarchy of collections. I still > think dct:source matches best since it directly says that the resource (the > filtered collection) was derived from that other resource (unfiltered > collection). And the deriving bit is a pretty strong indicator. Yes, I'm not opposed to using dct:source. I also wouldn't mind Hydra inventing its own predicate, if that's necessary. -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 12:03:33 UTC