- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:07:12 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
> I find this clear but a bit clumsy.
I agree about clumsy.
It's hard to strike a balance between clarity and exactness.
For instance, do we need "_directly_ following" or not?
For sure, everybody assumes this implicitly,
but technically, page 4 also follows page 1, just not directly.
I like the advice by Manu Sporny in hist post about the JSON-LD spec [1],
but I've not been able to obtain it yet in the current document.
> What about something along the lines of
> this
>
> If there exists a page following the current page, it MUST be referenced
> from the
> current page using hydra:next. A page referenced by hydra:next SHOULD NOT
> be empty.
>
> Still needs some wordsmithing but I think the gist is clear.
Maybe we can still do simpler, more instructive. Just trying:
The page MUST link to the next page using hydra:next,
unless the next page would be empty (then it SHOULD NOT be linked).
I think that goes into the right direction. Correct, concise, clear.
> Should we
> really talk about pages here? What about talking about fragments, partial
> fragments, fragment views or something similar instead?
I think pages is the simplest. They are really pages for me.
Best,
Ruben
[1] http://manu.sporny.org/2014/json-ld-origins-2/
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 22:07:44 UTC