- From: Nathan Ridley <axefrog@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:07:14 +1000
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMKTGkZTY2kuxmnxJCV-ozJ1Rt3ifwuqmHYk83UbqkCRAKtG7A@mail.gmail.com>
That explains, it thanks. Like you said, the interchangeability of "Hydra" with "Hydra Core Vocabulary" was my primary point of confusion. Nathan On 22 March 2015 at 09:02, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > Perhaps it's best to get terminology straight first: > – “Hydra” is a W3C community group concerning the development of > interoperable, hypermedia-driven Web APIs > In this working group, we discuss: > – “Hydra Core Vocabulary” is an RDF ontology with hypermedia API concepts > such as hypermedia controls > – “Linked Data Fragments” is a framework to examine queryable Linked Data > APIs. > > > LDF is a conceptual framework and TPF is just one possible (Hydra-based) > implementation for LDF. > > That's right (with “Hydra” being short for ”Hydra Core Vocabulary”). > > > Given that there are many things that could be implemented (or proposed) > using Hydra semantics, why the explicit side-by-side promotion of LDF and > TPF on the Hydra website? > > Because Hydra is more than only the Hydra Core Vocabulary. > TPF depends on the Hydra Core Vocabulary, but not the other way round. > Both TPF and the Core Vocabulary are in the Hydra W3C Community Group. > > > The presentational style suggests that to know Hydra, one should also > understand LDF and TPF > > That's correct: to know the Hydra W3C Community Group entirely, > you should understand the Hydra Core Vocabulary, LDF, and TPF. > > > I just don't quite understand why the two are presented in a style that > suggests that they're implicitly coupled somehow. > > Part of this is likely because on this list, “Hydra” and “Hydra Core > Vocabulary” > are often used interchangeably, while they are actually different things. > > I try to help clear up this confusion by consistently using “Hydra Core > Vocabulary”; > perhaps this is something we could start using in general. > > Best regards, > > Ruben -- *Google*: axefrog@gmail.com *Skype*: axefrog *Twitter*: @NathanRidley *Website*: http://axefrog.com / http://nathanridley.com *Phone: *+61 (0) 475 072789
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2015 03:07:41 UTC