- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:59:14 +0200
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
>> That's not possible due to patterns like >> ?x foaf:knows ?x > > Does the server need to know about that? Isn't it enough if the client knows > about this restriction? It's a triple pattern, so it could/should be supported. >> No, there is currently no interpretation for ?var. >> The string "?var" is represented as "?var" in explicit representation. >> ?var would be a URI (because no quotes), >> but relative URIs are not meaningful in this context anyway. > > Hmm.... I have to say I really don't like this. Could you clarify? It seems like a good thing for me: there currently is no interpretation for ?var, so no confusion can be caused. >> Does hydra:search have any formal meaning at all then? > > Depends on what you mean by "formal meaning". Is there anything at all a machine can derive if we use hydra:search? (Other than "it involves something with these parameters (but don't know how)".) Best, Ruben
Received on Monday, 22 June 2015 07:59:45 UTC