- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 22:47:31 +0200
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Markus, > No. I think we should address this differently, i.e., remove variables from TPF. That's not possible due to patterns like ?x foaf:knows ?x > Variables just make sense if they are bound to something. I wouldn't say that. They can serve as a placeholder for a value. > It would conflict with the Hydra spec as ?var would be interpreted as the > string "?var" and (likely) no triple would match. No, there is currently no interpretation for ?var. The string "?var" is represented as "?var" in explicit representation. ?var would be a URI (because no quotes), but relative URIs are not meaningful in this context anyway. So I would still want to clarify the syntax for variables. > Yep, that's the general idea. Think of hydra:filter like a parametrized > S(PAR)QL query Can I go ahead and make a pull request to add hydra:filter and clarify hydra:search? Does hydra:search have any formal meaning at all then? Best, Ruben
Received on Sunday, 21 June 2015 20:48:02 UTC