- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:32:25 +0200
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Cc: greg@evilfunhouse.com
Dear all, I'm working on a SPARQL processor that is supposed to be able to evaluate parts of the query by using TPFs, if it can discover them. Nowadays, it can't, because all it has is a SPARQL Protocol request and response, and there's no way in that for the endpoint to indicate that data may also be queried with TPFs, and it needs to find a way to get to the template. Ruben just made aware of that the Link header now can take a rel=URI, which resolves my main complaint with the Link header, as it can now be translated to RDF in a straightforward manner (see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-5.3 ) So, the question becomes, what URI should we use for the relation type? Perhaps hydra:entrypoint can be used? In some cases, hydra:search may be more appropriate? Or should we have something that would clearly state it is TPF? Like http://linkeddatafragments.org/descriptions/tpf ? Cheers, Kjetil
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 19:33:09 UTC