- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:52:31 +0100
- To: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
- Cc: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>, public-hydra@w3.org
> I would disagree on that point for hydra:Class, for example in Markus' issue tracker demo the API documentation [1] makes liberal use of it. > The implication being that all instances of these classes (i.e. the resources served by the API) are dereferenceable. > > > Let's maybe bring back the discussion to this point, > > Exactly, what would it mean if all mentions of hydra:Class in this API documentation were replaced by rdfs:Class or owl:Class? The meaning wouldn't change, IMHO. It would even be possible to just drop the hydra:Class there; it's implied anyway and never used directly. Ruben
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 12:52:59 UTC