- From: Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:34:56 +0100
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 11 January 2015 21:35:25 UTC
maybe also hydra:title :-) On 01/11/2015 10:18 PM, Ruben Verborgh wrote: >> Following this train of thought one would also have to question the added value of the hydra:Link class instead of using rdf:Property or owl:ObjectProperty. > Fair enough. As far as I'm concerned: to be discussed next :-) > > Ruben
Received on Sunday, 11 January 2015 21:35:25 UTC