Re: remove hydra:Resource and hydra:Class (ISSUE-90) from Holger Knublauch on 2015-01-08 (public-hydra@w3.org from January 2015)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 08:40:53 +1000
To: public-hydra@w3.org
Message-ID: <54AF0775.2010504@topquadrant.com>

On 1/9/15, 7:48 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> Ignoring the dereferenceability stuff for a moment: do you think it 
> makes sense to keep something like hydra:Class given that they are 
> quite different from RDFS classes due to hydra:supportedProperty? Of 
> course assuming we keep hydra:supportedProperty in more or less this 
> form :-)

Why could hydra:supportedProperty not be used for any rdfs:Class?

Introducing another metaclass may lead to a walled garden in which 
existing models need to be changed, raising the cost of adoption.

Holger

Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 22:41:26 UTC