- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:48:07 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 7 Jan 2015 at 23:49, Ruben Verborgh wrote: >> well.. but it might be that we can design them better. I have to think more about it... and I > guess we have more important stuff to figure out at the moment -- no, I didn't forget about > paged collections :-) > > Let's make an issue to track progress on this though? Here it is: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/90 Ignoring the dereferenceability stuff for a moment: do you think it makes sense to keep something like hydra:Class given that they are quite different from RDFS classes due to hydra:supportedProperty? Of course assuming we keep hydra:supportedProperty in more or less this form :-) -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 21:48:38 UTC