Re: Introduce VariableRepresentation class (was: variable representations edited for spec) from Ruben Verborgh on 2015-01-05 (public-hydra@w3.org from January 2015)

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:33:26 +0100
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Cc: Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E89BC750-1709-4471-BA04-4A4A5E69D96F@ugent.be>

> Thinking about it again, it might actually make
> sense to introduce such a class as it could help us to improve documentation
> of the vocabulary.

Great. Proposed spec changes:
https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/85

> BasicRepresentation and ExplicitRepresentation would be
> instances of VariableRepresentation though and not subclasses.

They never should have been classes in the first place;
that was a modeling error I accidentally introduced.
Given that they are indeed instances,
it does make sense to have some class for them.

Best,

Ruben

Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 10:33:58 UTC