- From: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:08:19 +0100
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
Hi, Am 15.02.2015 um 17:37 schrieb Andrew Hacking: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl > <mailto:tomasz@t-code.pl>> wrote: > > I hope I am wrong, but it is starting to look like Hydra can't really > offer anything reasonable that I can use in modern applications without > having to break out of it and just do what I do already. Or stay on the list and help form something useful :) Like you, I am not coming from a Linked-Data background and had my share of WTF moments with the difficulties you face if you embrace the simple idea that every JSON attribute gets its own URI. > The hypermedia returned from a single api endpoint is not the full > application context, it cannot provide all the valid transitions for > my application yet we keep pursuing this approach like its the > early1990s. I think the sooner people realize this, the sooner we > can all move on and design interoperability standards that work well > for real world intelligent clients On that we disagree. But that discussion belongs to a different thread than pagination or maybe even a different group. Are you aware of [1]. Best regards, Dietrich [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/hypermedia-web
Received on Monday, 16 February 2015 08:08:52 UTC