Re: query language

On 9/10/14 5:54 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>
>> what's interesting is what interaction semantics are associated with 
>> an identifier. are applications supposed to follow them (links), or 
>> are they supposed to treat them as fixed representations of 
>> well-known concepts (identifiers)? two different kinds of interaction 
>> semantics that must be made explicit.
>
> That' kicker!  The semantics of different kinds of interactions should 
> be explicit, at the very least, in any spec. We get in to trouble (RDF 
> and Linked Data are contemporary examples) when we treat these nuances 
> implicitly in specs and associated memes.
>>
>> cheers, 

Clearly meant to say:


That's the  kicker!  The semantics of different kinds of interactions 
should be explicit, at the very least, in any spec. We get in to trouble 
(RDF and Linked Data are contemporary examples) when we treat these 
nuances implicitly, in specs and associated memes.

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this