- From: László Lajos Jánszky <laszlo.janszky@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:19:59 +0200
- To: Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, public-hydra@w3.org
+1 I think more examples and tutorials would help newcomers to start with Hydra. Specifications are usually too dry texts to start with them... 2014-09-04 12:27 GMT+02:00 Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com>: > Hey, > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > >> “ >> they perceive it as being too complex. >> For the time being, we use HAL with lots of 'assumptions' […]. >> Not ideal I think, but well…” > > I don't want to use HAL either; I have the impression the JSON-LD + > Hydra story is a better foundation. But while I think JSON-LD is > explainable enough, I don't think the same applies to Hydra right now, > and I find myself thinking "I should just go to HAL", too. But I don't > think Hydra is actually more complex when you use it for the same > purposes of HAL, it's just the spec doesn't hold your hands enough. I > realize that the RDF-like nature of Hydra makes everything supremely > flexible, but best practices and worked out examples of them is still > valuable in the spec. > > But I'm not sure, as I don't understand the spec yet. :) > > Regards, > > Martijn >
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 11:20:26 UTC