- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:15:08 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 15 Okt 2014 at 22:42, Ruben Verborgh wrote: >> To be honest, not really but my gut feeling is that using hydra:totalItems >> should be fine. > > I guess I will eventually make that the default then, > with the VoID equivalent as a recommendation. > > (Note: perhaps we should say something at hydra:totalItems, > maybe even make the relation explicit in the vocabulary.) You mean something about the relationship between hydra:totalItems and void:triples? Is there really a relationship between the two in the general case, i.e., in non-LDF use cases? >> IWhat's your experience regarding the accuracy of the >> triple count? Are there implementations that are far off? > > Current implementations seem exact for low numbers > and within 10% error margin for large numbers. What kind of backends produces those 10% "errors"? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 14:15:34 UTC