- From: Hendy Irawan <ceefour666@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:17:30 +0000
- To: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 18:55:28 UTC
In the Hydra spec I see hydra being represented as:
1. "@context": {
"hydra": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#",
2. "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/context.jsonld",
3. "@id": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core",
Which one is correct? How does a JSON-LD client knows that (presumably?)
all three URIs are the same thing?
If I write a pure Hydra document with a single @context, what should I use:
1. "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#",
2. "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/context.jsonld",
What's the difference? And which one is "easiest" for a (rather naive)
client to consume, but still ability to distinguish properties from
different namespaces? (Without being a "full" compliance to entire spec)
Hendy
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 18:55:28 UTC