- From: Hendy Irawan <ceefour666@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:17:30 +0000
- To: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 18:55:28 UTC
In the Hydra spec I see hydra being represented as: 1. "@context": { "hydra": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#", 2. "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/context.jsonld", 3. "@id": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core", Which one is correct? How does a JSON-LD client knows that (presumably?) all three URIs are the same thing? If I write a pure Hydra document with a single @context, what should I use: 1. "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#", 2. "@context": "http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/context.jsonld", What's the difference? And which one is "easiest" for a (rather naive) client to consume, but still ability to distinguish properties from different namespaces? (Without being a "full" compliance to entire spec) Hendy
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 18:55:28 UTC