- From: McBennett, Pat <McBennettP@DNB.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 05:27:23 -0500
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'Ruben Verborgh' <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- CC: "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>, 'Gregg Kellogg' <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Lanthaler [mailto:markus.lanthaler@gmx.net] > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 3:43 PM > To: 'Ruben Verborgh' > Cc: public-hydra@w3.org; 'Gregg Kellogg' > Subject: RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (ISSUE-41) > (was: hydra:Link) > > On Friday, May 16, 2014 9:40 AM, Ruben Verborgh wrote: > > I'll give a meta-answer if you don't mind: > > at the moment, I'm really confused about what the options are, and > > what their specific advantages and disadvantages include. > > This happened because I missed a few mails, and now it seems very hard > > to catch up. > > I suspect several people feel the same way. > > > > Proposal: could we make a wiki page on Hydra's GitHub which describes > > each (still relevant) proposal with: > > Yeah, good idea. I'm just about to leave and will be offline for the weekend. I > already planned to write a summary of all this as input for schema.org. I'll do > so early next week. Hopefully I'll find the time.. I still have to prepare to talks > for the APIcon SF which is the week after. > > Have a nice weekend all, > Markus > Fantastic! I've been itching to contribute to this conversation too, but like Ruben I've been struggling to keep up (due to work commitments). The Wiki page with a summary of options sounds like the perfect opportunity to 're-boot'... > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > >
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 10:27:53 UTC