- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:57:21 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 19 Jun 2014 at 12:27, Jindřich Mynarz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Markus Lanthaler > <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: >>> It's currently defined as "A IRI template that can be >>> used to query a collection" (note a typo: "A*n* IRI"), which hints >>> that it's rdfs:domain is hydra:Collection. This is not captured >>> explicitly in the RDF description of Hydra. >> >> Yeah, that's true. But I think we should rather fix the description and not the domain. Or > we use schema:domainIncludes (probably better). hydra:search isn't very > well defined at the moment. > > I think I'd prefer using schema:domainIncludes (because of its > intended owl:unionOf-like semantics). Me too. > When you say that we should fix > the description of hydra:search, do you mean that it should be > broadened to not only hint to hydra:Collection? Exactly. > BTW, why have you redirected the thread to the > public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org mailing list? Is this a new > mailing list for Linked Data Fragments? Yes. It was a test... I didn't think anyone will notice it :-) More on that in a couple of minutes. Stay tuned! It's exciting news -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 11:57:53 UTC