W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > June 2014

RE: Documenting implicit rdfs:domains of Hydra properties

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:57:21 +0200
To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <040601cf8c7e$cca24bf0$65e6e3d0$@gmx.net>
On 19 Jun 2014 at 12:27, Jindřich Mynarz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Markus Lanthaler
> <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> It's currently defined as "A IRI template that can be
>>> used to query a collection" (note a typo: "A*n* IRI"), which hints
>>> that it's rdfs:domain is hydra:Collection. This is not captured
>>> explicitly in the RDF description of Hydra.
>> 
>> Yeah, that's true. But I think we should rather fix the description and not the domain. Or
> we use schema:domainIncludes (probably better). hydra:search isn't very
> well defined at the moment.
> 
> I think I'd prefer using schema:domainIncludes (because of its
> intended owl:unionOf-like semantics). 

Me too.


> When you say that we should fix
> the description of hydra:search, do you mean that it should be
> broadened to not only hint to hydra:Collection?

Exactly.


> BTW, why have you redirected the thread to the
> public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org mailing list? Is this a new
> mailing list for Linked Data Fragments?

Yes. It was a test... I didn't think anyone will notice it :-) More on that in a couple of minutes. Stay tuned! It's exciting news


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 11:57:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:53:59 UTC